![]() Decoders received either emotion recognition training, bogus training, or no training. In Study 2, we manipulated decoders’ emotion recognition ability and the type of lies they saw: experiential or affective (emotional and unemotional). ![]() Accuracy was found to be unrelated to facial cue recognition and negatively related to empathy. Decoders’ veracity judgements were compared based on differences in trait empathy and their ability to recognise microexpressions and subtle expressions. In Study 1, the role of emotion recognition in the process of detecting naturalistic lies was investigated. Here, we address the relationship between emotional information and veracity judgements. ![]() While research on the diagnostic value of such cues has been mixed, their influence on human veracity judgements is yet to be fully explored. People hold strong beliefs about the role of emotional cues in detecting deception. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |